A revision of spells.

[Salkand]

It sometimes appears to me that spells are either too weak or too strong based on thier lore.

Ex. Fireball, the most used spell in history is a very powerful spell. By lv 3, attacking someone with max resist would do 70% of firing 1 fireball.

Dragon breath is a lore 13 spell, yet when used in battle it generally does a lot worse than fireball.

Now, I may have exagerated a little on the actual statistics, but I'm sure you see the point I am attempting to make. I simply suggest a revision to spell strength and variety be taken into consideration.

[Iro]

Originally Posted by Salkand

It sometimes appears to me that spells are either too weak or too strong based on thier lore.

Ex. Fireball, the most used spell in history is a very powerful spell. By lv 3, attacking someone with max resist would do 70% of firing 1 fireball.

Dragon breath is a lore 13 spell, yet when used in battle it generally does a lot worse than fireball.

Now, I may have exagerated a little on the actual statistics, but I'm sure you see the point I am attempting to make. I simply suggest a revision to spell strength and variety be taken into consideration.

Fireball is a Lore 4 spell, so you really can't compare it to a level 3. I see what you mean, though.

Assume Fireball and Dragonbreath are both used by one player with 15 Fire. A single fireball will do less damage than the full force of a dragonbreath spell.

You're thinking about how players cast multiple fireballs, and that isn't what the spell does itself.